I guess quite a few people noticed the pattern. When you use terms like samsara and nirvana, relative and absolute instead of finite and infinite, the same goes for Buddhism, at least Tibetan Buddhism that I know a bit about.
For some reason the Buddhist way speaks to me more clearly. There may be a moment when you accept the path as a whole, including some more esoteric aspects, but you can also start small and understand it as just training yourself and your brain to dwell in the infinite place. Because everything is your mind anyway. It's nothing more that a perspective, a way of processing and relating with the world. It's actually very simple, but it's hard to cut through and get there. I mean, relatively hard. But once tasted, you can never go back. Buddhists actually call this first major transformational experience the stream entry. For the rest, you just follow the stream, it will carry your forward 🙂
It's actually a catastrophe that instead of importing Dharma to the West, we ended up importing meditation. People think the whole thing is pretty sterile, they have some experience with it and it doesn't work as expected. But it's actually numinous beyond measure.
And yeah, once you dwell in the infinite, the finite is no longer an issue at all. It doesn't matter. It doesn't have any bad properties. It all just becomes means to an end, at best. Samsara becomes nirvana 🙂✌️
I do kinda wonder what would happen if I encountered some more mystical strains of Christianity. Well, I guess it's too late now and there is no issue with that, but weirdly enough, I don't think we often talk about Christianity as a mystical path. What a pity.
Anyway, wishing everybody to find the infinite dwelling place 🙏🏻
Well, once in the infinite, or perhaps non-duality, beyond concepts and words, you don't care about the story anyway. Until then, you need a vehicle. For some reason almost nobody talks about this. That at some point there is no framework any more, no reference point. And the division and threshold is really about getting into the non-conceptual space of pure being. Life becomes just life as is. Which doesn't mean anything until tasted. At the end, there is no Buddhism and no God. That is what the infinite place feels like to me. I am actually writing this because my previous comment is a bit about selling a different path. But you know, it doesn't matter, when you aim to the right spot. Don't get too identified with the vehicle. But until then, you may need to completely give yourself up to the vehicle. It's all bizarre and paradoxical, isn't it 🙂
I mean that's exactly the argument I make in the essay? The meaning crisis is the key driver of existential issues in our culture like nihilism, alienation, anxiety, despair, disconnection, meaninglessness, and the addictions are coping strategies for dealing with these underlying pains. I'm not a fan of Gabor Mate, he puts far too much emphasis on childhood trauma in addiction and ignores genetics, neuro biology and the social environment. Dr Anna Lembke or Mark Lewis are better thinkers on the subject.
I don't think that meaning crisis necessarily leads to addiction. Unprocessed trauma, emotional and physical pain, those lead to addiction. See Gabor Mate's work.
But yea, meaning crisis could drive people back to mainstream religion. I think more and more people start realizing that secularism has no meaning and it's pointless, so they start looking for meaning somewhere else. Mainstream religion is probably a familiar and obvious starting point.
I guess quite a few people noticed the pattern. When you use terms like samsara and nirvana, relative and absolute instead of finite and infinite, the same goes for Buddhism, at least Tibetan Buddhism that I know a bit about.
For some reason the Buddhist way speaks to me more clearly. There may be a moment when you accept the path as a whole, including some more esoteric aspects, but you can also start small and understand it as just training yourself and your brain to dwell in the infinite place. Because everything is your mind anyway. It's nothing more that a perspective, a way of processing and relating with the world. It's actually very simple, but it's hard to cut through and get there. I mean, relatively hard. But once tasted, you can never go back. Buddhists actually call this first major transformational experience the stream entry. For the rest, you just follow the stream, it will carry your forward 🙂
It's actually a catastrophe that instead of importing Dharma to the West, we ended up importing meditation. People think the whole thing is pretty sterile, they have some experience with it and it doesn't work as expected. But it's actually numinous beyond measure.
And yeah, once you dwell in the infinite, the finite is no longer an issue at all. It doesn't matter. It doesn't have any bad properties. It all just becomes means to an end, at best. Samsara becomes nirvana 🙂✌️
I do kinda wonder what would happen if I encountered some more mystical strains of Christianity. Well, I guess it's too late now and there is no issue with that, but weirdly enough, I don't think we often talk about Christianity as a mystical path. What a pity.
Anyway, wishing everybody to find the infinite dwelling place 🙏🏻
Well, once in the infinite, or perhaps non-duality, beyond concepts and words, you don't care about the story anyway. Until then, you need a vehicle. For some reason almost nobody talks about this. That at some point there is no framework any more, no reference point. And the division and threshold is really about getting into the non-conceptual space of pure being. Life becomes just life as is. Which doesn't mean anything until tasted. At the end, there is no Buddhism and no God. That is what the infinite place feels like to me. I am actually writing this because my previous comment is a bit about selling a different path. But you know, it doesn't matter, when you aim to the right spot. Don't get too identified with the vehicle. But until then, you may need to completely give yourself up to the vehicle. It's all bizarre and paradoxical, isn't it 🙂
I mean that's exactly the argument I make in the essay? The meaning crisis is the key driver of existential issues in our culture like nihilism, alienation, anxiety, despair, disconnection, meaninglessness, and the addictions are coping strategies for dealing with these underlying pains. I'm not a fan of Gabor Mate, he puts far too much emphasis on childhood trauma in addiction and ignores genetics, neuro biology and the social environment. Dr Anna Lembke or Mark Lewis are better thinkers on the subject.
I don't think that meaning crisis necessarily leads to addiction. Unprocessed trauma, emotional and physical pain, those lead to addiction. See Gabor Mate's work.
But yea, meaning crisis could drive people back to mainstream religion. I think more and more people start realizing that secularism has no meaning and it's pointless, so they start looking for meaning somewhere else. Mainstream religion is probably a familiar and obvious starting point.